California rules signal end of road for high-pollution trucks and gas-powered lawn mowers – CBS News

California rules signal end of road for high-pollution trucks and gas-powered lawn mowers - CBS News

Forget speeding tickets: California truck drivers will soon have to watch out for pollution tickets.

State regulators on Thursday voted to crack down on heavy duty trucks weighing more than 14,000 pounds — those big semi-trailers that make up just 3% of all vehicles in California but spend so much time on the road they account for more than half of all pollution from cars and trucks each year in the Golden State.

New rules will require these big trucks, including ones from other states passing through California, to be tested at least four times per year to make sure they meet the state’s standards for particulate matter and ozone pollution.

To enforce the rules, state officials say they will install roadside monitoring devices to catch trucks that pollute too much. Automated license plate readers would help authorities identify offenders, who could be cited if they refuse to make repairs.

The state has two of these unattended monitoring devices in place and plans to install more. The devices resemble toll booths and capture a sample of the truck’s exhaust as it passes through without stopping.

Environmental advocates said the rule — mandated by a 2019 law authored by state Senator Connie Leyva — is the most significant action in a dozen years to clean up California’s air, which consistently ranks among the dirtiest in the country. State officials estimate the rules will prevent more than 7,000 premature deaths tied to respiratory illnesses by 2050, avoiding more than $75 billion in future health care costs.

The rules “have some significance for climate, but what we’re really talking about here is the smog and the particulate matter that is making people sick and killing people,” said Bill Magavern, policy director for the Coalition for Clean Air, a statewide advocacy group.

The proposal is one of a flurry of forthcoming changes that could dramatically reshape consumer and industry behavior in the nation’s most populous state that, were it an independent country, would have the world’s fifth-largest economy.

Also on Thursday, the California Air Resources Board agreed to ban the sale of new products run by small gas-powered engines, including leaf blowers, lawn mowers and portable generators — a rule recently mandated by the state’s Democratic-dominated state Legislature. Next year, regulators are poised to tighten emission standards for barges, ferries, fishing boats and tugboats that line California’s coastal cities.

And, further down the road, regulators plan to ban the sale of all new gas-powered cars by 2035.

“These are the decisions we have to make if we’re serious about reducing our reliance on fossil fuels and leaving future generations with healthier communities,” said Assemblyman Marc Berman, a Democrat from Palo Alto who authored the law requiring the ban on new gas-powered lawn equipment.

While the new smog check rules for big trucks will have the largest impact on air quality — preventing more than 680,000 tons of smog by 2050 — banning the sale of new gas-powered lawn equipment will be the rule consumers notice the most.

Gas-powered lawn mowers, leaf blowers

California and cities across the nation have been banning gas-powered leaf blowers and mowers which emit pollutants that could lead to lung cancer, heart disease and respiratory problems, California lawmakers say. 

Using a gas-powered lawn mower for an hour generates the same amount of emissions roughly as a car driving from Los Angeles to Las Vegas, according to the California Air Resources Board. State regulators say the amount of pollution that comes from running a gas-powered leaf blower for one hour is comparable to driving a gas-powered car about 1,100 miles — or roughly the distance between Los Angeles and Denver.

Brookline, Massachusetts, has a seasonal ban on gas-powered leaf blowers, as does Montclair, New Jersey, and Burlington, Vermont. Lawmakers in Illinois last year introduced a bill that, if passed, would ban the operation or sale of gas-powered leaf blowers. The measure is still undergoing amendments. A similar bill in New York, introduced two months ago, now sits in a state Senate committee.

Car engines have advanced over the years to pollute less. But the small engines that power most lawn equipment haven’t made as much progress. 

“Nobody will have to give up or stop using equipment they already own. The force of this regulation falls on manufacturers,” Berman said. Experts agree that how quickly other states follow suit with the California ban depends on the companies that make electric lawn care equipment. 

“I think the easier the manufacturers make it for other states to adopt the same sort of ban, the more states will do it,” University of Southern California environmental law professor Robin Craig told CBS News correspondent Anthony Pura. 

The rules will have the biggest impact on professional landscapers, who rely on gas-powered equipment to do multiple jobs per day. California lawmakers included $30 million in the most recent state budget to assist these companies converting to battery-powered equipment. But on Thursday, some landscapers testified that equipment would not be as reliable.

Andrew Bray, vice president of government relations at the National Association of Professional Landscapers, told the Associated Press in September that some of the electric landscaping devices cannot finish a day’s work without being recharged multiple times.

“With leaf blowers, for example, they don’t yet have the battery power needed for commercial use,” Bray said. 

Still, lawn care professionals like David Hernandez of Sod and Turf Pros in Los Angeles, see emissions-free electric tools as the future. Said Hernandes, “You won’t be having all that gas up in your nose, you won’t be inhaling it — because I’ve been there, I’ve done that.”

For Jared Anderman, of Croton-on-Hudson, New York, switching from gasoline-powered tools to electric ones for lawn care was a no-brainer.

“I’m concerned about climate change and wanted tools that are more eco-friendly, and also quieter. I like listening to music when I do yard work and this way I can enjoy music or a podcast while I work,” he said. “I could never do that with gas-powered equipment.”

Too much, too fast?

Trucking companies and small engine manufacturers have mostly complained about how fast these new standards would be imposed. Both the smog check rules for trucks and the ban on the sale of new gas-powered lawn equipment would be fully implemented by 2024, while a similar ban on sales of new gas-powered generators would take effect in 2028.

Some trucking industry representatives on Thursday urged regulators to first test the rule with a pilot program before implementing it statewide. The parts truckers will need to comply with these new rules are becoming harder and more expensive to find, raising fears it could force some trucks off the road while waiting for repairs and could worsen recent supply-chain problems that have hobbled businesses and frustrated consumers.

Chris Shimoda, senior vice president for government affairs with the California Trucking Association, said one sensor truckers often need, that normally costs around $300, now can cost $7,000 or more. But the new rules do allow for extensions for people who have trouble getting parts.

“We just want to make sure that, again, anybody experiencing those sort of issues is not left high and dry,” Shimoda said.

Jeff Coad, vice president for marketing and product management for the engine manufacturer Briggs & Stratton, said the company is ambivalent about how its products are powered but said it won’t have enough time to fully comply.

“Converting a product such as a large zero-turn mower from gas to lithium battery power is not just a matter of replacing the engine with the battery,” he said, adding that the development time can take up to two years.

Liane Randolph, chair of the California Air Resources Board, said the state is sensitive to those concerns, adding that regulators do a careful analysis of both the costs and the health benefits of any proposed rule.

“These regulations result in less trips to the emergency room, less long-term health impacts, and, frankly, less medical costs for the community,” she said.